Abortion is sometimes humane… right?

“Abortion for a fetus with congenital disease or abnormality is the responsible and humane option.” Is this view consistent POST-birth? Is it humane to murder an infant diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome, a toddler with Multiple Sclerosis, or child with Muscular Dystrophy? Can God not heal? Can God not give grace? Does God not have a purpose?

If God takes special interest in the weak & helpless people of the world (Exodus 22:21-24; Psalm 68:5; 82:3-4; 94:6-7,23), shouldn’t we stand up for those who cannot protect or even speak for themselves?

Posted in Abortion

Abortion VS Life: What are the facts?

My previous post compared 19th century slavery with modern abortion. Both atrocities were justified by de-humanizing the victims and defining them as property. As the previous post clearly demonstrates the Pro-Life position is MORALLY superior, this post intends to demonstrate the Pro-Life position is also FACTUALLY superior.

 

“The fetus is not alive.”

Abortion advocates famously label the fetus as “just a clump of cells,” but this claim does not hold up to scientific scrutiny. A fetus performs living, human functions – like heartbeats or measurable brain waves (every legal abortion stops both). Modern medical science now knows that a fetus can feel pain, be startled, respond to his mother’s laughter, dream & even begin learning his mother’s language.

Although recently discovered by science, these facts were well known in the ancient world. When God gave Moses the laws for the nation of Israel, He calls the fetus “life” (Exodus 21:22-23). The fetus is not an amorphous clump of cells but a complex, functioning, living being.

 

“The fetus is not a human being.”

In a feeble attempt to save face, abortion advocates fall back to the untenable position that the fetus is not a human being. Yet the Pro-Choice advocate never establishes of what species he believes the fetus belongs? Is there a zebra or aardvark in the woman’s uterus? This position, of course, also crumbles under factual scrutiny. A simply DNA test reveals that the fetus is absolutely human. And there’s more; science reveals that preborn babies feel human emotions – like fear, pain, connection, and love. 

Once again, we find Holy Scripture revealing facts long before science can explain them. According to Job 3:11, an unborn baby has a living soul (ghost), and even before the prophet Jeremiah’s organs were formed, God knew him as a living person with a unique plan (Jeremiah 1:5).  And consider this… the first person to recognize Jesus as Messiah, was an unborn baby (Luke 1:41-43).

 

“The fetus is part of the mother’s body.”

THE TRICK QUESTION: Shouldn’t a woman have the right to choose what she does with her body? This sneaky question is the premise of the Pro-Choice (Pro-Abortion) position, but A FETUS IS NOT THE WOMAN’S BODY. Having received 23 chromosomes from each parent, a fetus has its own distinct DNA. A fetus also has its own distinct blood. And no woman has 2 hearts, 2 brains, 4 arms, 4 eyes, and 4 legs.

THE REAL QUESTION: If our society deems it immoral & unlawful to murder babies after they’re born, why should we allow babies to be murdered before they’re born? It is a society’s responsibility to restrict behavior – even in regards to one’s own body; that’s why there are laws restricting self-mutilation, suicide and heroine abuse. But science confirms the plea of our conscience, that a fetus is a distinct living, human person. 

Posted in Abortion

Property or Person – the greatest atrocity of our time

The Atrocities

150 years ago, a moral atrocity plagued our country – SLAVERY. The moral conflict was so intense, it incited our nation’s bloodiest war. In hindsight it’s virtually impossible to justify slavery, but contemporaneous proponents based their justification on the argument:

  1. Africans were sub-human
  2. Therefore they should not be afforded basic human rights, and
  3. Therefore they are inferior to the RIGHTS of the property owners (masters)
    **In other words, slaves were merely property to be abused, sold or killed at the whim of the owner.

Today, a new moral atrocity plagues our country – ABORTION. Its justification (though irrational, unscientific, and inhumane) is congruent to salvery’s:

  1. Fetuses are sub-human
  2. Therefore they should not be afforded basic human rights, and
  3. Therefore they are inferior to the RIGHTS of the property owners (mothers)
    **In other words, fetuses are merely property to be killed at the whim of the owner.

In both cases, the stated position is contrary to scientific fact (e.g. DNA, heartbeats, brain waves) and void of moral decency. Alleging that a person is merely property and therefore subject to the whims of the property owner is equally contemptible today as it was 150 years ago.

 

The Resolutions

On the issue of slavery, there were 3 primary roles:

  1. The Slaveowner rejected facts and stubbornly held the insolent position that slaves were merely property.
  2. The Passivist accepted facts and/or morals, but while he personally would not own slaves, he felt guilty about denying the slaveowner’s “legal right.” He did nothing in the face of the great atrocity.
  3. The Abolitionist vehemently urged their representatives, fought in the war, housed fugitive slaves, and worked diligently to rectify the atrocity of slavery. History books are rife with their honorable stories.

On the issue of abortion, there are 3 similar roles:

  1. The Slaveowner advocates for abortion. He is either ignorant or defiant of scientific fact.
  2. The Passivist is personally opposed to abortion yet fails to deny the mother’s “legal right.” In the face of this great atrocity, he does nothing. 
  3. The Abolitionist is the hero. Despite pressure, sacrifice, and inconvenience he fights against the greatest atrocity of our time. To future generations, he will be the only respectable character of this age.

When we reflect on slavery, we disdain the Slaveowner as evil; we judge the Passivist as indifferent, but we celebrate the Abolitionist as a hero.  In the not-to-distant future, the world will view abortion in the same light. Which role will you play?

Let’s talk about this – what are ways to become an Abolitionist of abortion?