Tag: Bible

Abortion is sometimes humane… right?

“Abortion for a fetus with congenital disease or abnormality is the responsible and humane option.” Is this view consistent POST-birth? Is it humane to murder an infant diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome, a toddler with Multiple Sclerosis, or child with Muscular Dystrophy? Can God not heal? Can God not give grace? Does God not have a purpose?

If God takes special interest in the weak & helpless people of the world (Exodus 22:21-24; Psalm 68:5; 82:3-4; 94:6-7,23), shouldn’t we stand up for those who cannot protect or even speak for themselves?

Posted in Bible Doctrine

Faith-based view of the Bible

Posted on by James

A faith-based view of the Bible is a principal conviction of my life, and while most Christians would claim that their beliefs about the Bible are based on faith, often they are not. The two goals of this post are to explain the position of a faith-based view of the Bible and to expose its opposition.

Explaining the Position of a Faith-based View

So what exactly is a faith-based view of the Bible? That one’s beliefs about the Bible are based on faith in (i.e. believing) what the Bible says about Itself. Allow these congruent examples of faith-based beliefs to clarify:

  • Faith-based view of the CREATION:
    I believe God created everything in 6 days… because that’s what the Bible says. It is recorded Genesis & confirmed in the New Testament (Mark 10:6-8. Hebrews 1:10. 2 Peter 3:4) Although there are many Creationist scientists; Henry Morris has fantastic books; and Answers in Genesis has compelling thoughts about science… I believe in creation by FAITH (i.e. trusting what the Bible says).
    Hebrews 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

  • Faith-based view of the FLOOD:
    I believe God destroyed life with a worldwide flood, sparing only the people and animals on the Ark… because that’s what the Bible says. Again, it is recorded in Genesis & confirmed by in the New Testament (Luke 17:26-27. Hebrews 11:7. 2 Peter 2:5). I don’t believe in the flood because every culture has an account of a cataclysmic flood, because archaeology may have found parts of the Ark, or because historians conclude that contemporaneous technology could have constructed an Ark compatible with Scripture; those things are interesting, but I believe in the flood by FAITH (i.e. trusting what the Bible says).
  • Faith-based view of the RESURRECTION:
    I believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead… because that’s what the Bible says (Mark 9:31. Mark 16:6. Acts 17:31), not because they found an empty tomb that they believe was Jesus’, not based of the writings of Josephus, and not dependent on shroud of Turin. I believe in the resurrection by FAITH (i.e. trusting what the Bible says).

Accordingly, a faith-based view of the Bible demands that one’s beliefs about the Bible are defined by the Bible Itself.

There are certain things I don’t understand about Creation, the Flood, and the resurrection (physics, chemistry, biology). Likewise, there are certain things I don’t understand concerning God’s Word – how did they decide which books to go in the Bible, when to add sections that were only in a few manuscripts, or which word to choose – but in all cases, I believe in spite of my questions.
2 Corinthians 5:7 (For we walk by faith, not by sight:)

I suggest that the foundational issue of faith is critical to how a believer approaches every doctrine… including the Word of God itself.
Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

Exposing the Opposition of a Faith-based View

Many Christians carry a faith-based view of the creation, the flood, the resurrection and salvation. If asked, “What do you believe about Heaven, Hell and salvation?” they would immediately refer to Bible verses to express their beliefs – because FAITH in the Bible is the basis for their beliefs on those subjects. But when asked about Scripture Itself (what they claim is the basis for all their beliefs), they automatically refer (and defer) to extra-biblical sources, and this immediate response exposes the authority & basis for their beliefs. Consider these faulty sources that are common for beliefs about the Bible:

  • Manuscript Science – how many; how old; how complete; where they were located; who possessed them; what kind of condition they’re in.
    But the man of God should forsake science to keep the Scriptures that are committed to him.

    1 Timothy 6:20-21 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith…
    Observe the warning that science will cause men to err from the faith. Science is the enemy of faith.

  • Secular Philosophy – the lines/origins of manuscripts; minority vs majority texts; Textual Criticism.
    But the man of God should be established in the faith (i.e. trusting in God’s Word).

    Colossians 2:7-8 Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving. Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
    Observe the warning that while faith will establish the believer, philosophy will spoil the believer. Secular philosophy is the enemy of faith.

  • Human Wisdom – the education, beliefs & morals of the translators; readability of versions; recommendation from a professor or pastor; popularity.
    But the man of God should stand in faith of God’s Word.

    1 Corinthians 2:4-5 And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
    Observe that man’s wisdom is a faulty foundation for our beliefs. Human wisdom is the enemy of faith.

  • Traditional Fables – which version is older; which version we’ve always used; which version did a favorite theologian use.
    But the man of God should be nourished up & edified in the words of faith & doctrine.

    1 Timothy 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
    1 Timothy 4:6-7 If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained. But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.
    Observe that traditional fables yield questions not spiritual growth.

  • Worldly Cares – possibility for human error; pragmatic fear of congregational acceptance.
    But the man of God should trust that God will provide and should subject his fears to faith.
    Matthew 6:30 & Matthew 16:8 reveal that worrying about God’s provision is a lack of faith.
    Matthew 8:26 and Matthew 14:31 reveal that fear of circumstances is a lack of faith.
    Observe that worldly cares focus on man’s abilities (and inabilities) not God’s ability. Worldly cares are the enemy of faith.

**NOTE – All these are intriguing and valuable subjects – BUT NEVER should they take priority, precedence, or power over what the Bible says about Itself.

If one of these is your answer to what you believe about the Bible, I suggest you search out what the Bible says about Itself and allow that to define your beliefs. This is merely the foundational view/ approach to the Bible. Dedicate yourself to discovering what God says about His Word.

 

Posted in Bible Doctrine, Ministry

Who runs the church – Part 2

Posted on by James

I recently wrote on the subject of church authority. You can read the entire post here. The essence was: God designed the church to be led by a team of elders (AKA pastors), with one leader of leaders. The post was supplemented with a warning against a common distortion of Elder Rule – the malpractice of labeling non-pastors as elders. 

From that post I received some astute (and kind) questions concerning the definition of “ordained elder.” First, I want to mention that I appreciate feedback – especially of the courteous variety. The two primary questions are “How do you define an ORDAINED ELDER?” and “Would Presbyterian Ruling Elders qualify as ORDAINED ELDERS?” In this post I intend to address these two questions and clarify the definition of ordained elder. 

 

How do you define an ordained elder?

The Bible uses the term ELDER synonymously and interchangeably with SHEPHERD/PASTOR (1 Peter 5:1-4) and BISHOP (Titus 1:5-7). Elder, Pastor, and Bishop are terms for the same office (this is not surprising as the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost, Israel, the church, and the Scriptures each hold several monikers).  There can be no Biblical ELDER who is not also a PASTOR and BISHOP. In cases where a church has elders who are not given the governing authority or teaching authority or ministerial authority, that church dangerously distorted the title and office of ELDER.

Additionally, it is beneficial to consider the Biblical description of the calling & ministry of an ELDER. A Biblical ELDER must:

  • Be called by the Spirit through a driving desire for ministry. 
  • Be ordained by the church planter and/or existing group of elders of the local church (i.e. presbytery). No church elder in Scripture was ordained or ratified by a denomination, association, or central church. 
  • Be primarily occupied with the ministry of the Word and prayer. Not just tasked with administrative boards, policies, councils, and committees but tasked with watching for the souls of the members, with protecting the flock from false doctrine, and with correcting sin in the church body.

 An ELDER’s calling & ministry must be consistent with the Scriptural description of the office. When a church gives the title of ELDER to men with no calling or with only operational responsibilities, that church has misplaced the title of ELDER.

 

Would Presbyterian Ruling Elders qualify as ordained elders?

The inquirer hails from a Presbyterian (PCA specifically) church where Elders must be men, meet the character requirements of 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1, and be examined and trained. Being in no way an authority on that brand of Presbyterian ecclesiology, I read the denomination’s Book of Church Order. While somewhat more Scriptural than some Presbyterian variants, I conclude that PCA differ markedly from the Biblical office of Elders.  

The PCA acknowledges that Elder, Pastor, & Bishop are synonymous, yet it still creates two distinct orders of elders – also called Teaching Elders and Ruling Elders. More than a mere difference in their area of leadership, the PCA also sets up two orders that are substantially different from each other. While some suggest (inconclusively) that 1 Timothy 5:17 implies some elders are not teaching elders, there is no Biblical ground for a lower order of elders who have different callings, ordination or authority. 

  • Teaching Elders are gifted and called to ministry by the Holy Spirit. PCA recognizes no such gifting or call for Ruling Elders.
  • The “Presbytery” (by which they mean denominational district leaders not the leadership of the local church) is comprised of all Teaching Elders and only a fraction of Ruling Elders.
  • Teaching Elders are ordained, installed, and removed by the “Presbytery” (denominational district leaders); Ruling Elders are controlled by local churches.
  • If there is no Teaching Elder in a local church, and no “Stated Supply” (substitute) can be found, the “Presbytery” (denominational district leaders) may authorize a Ruling Elder to have limited pastoral service (that of Teaching Elder)… BUT for no longer than a year.

The answer to “Would Presbyterian Ruling Elders qualify as ordained elders?” is no – because neither the churches nor the Elders themselves see them as Pastors. They are seen as many Baptist deacons are seen – decision-making laymen… but not Pastors.  The Biblical model of church polity vests authority not in a central church, denomination or association but in the elders of an autonomous local church – whether they are vocational, bi-vocational or tentmakers.

 

Why does it matter?

First, allow me to say that I rejoice to hear about people who have been born again and are serving our Lord Jesus, and I have no animosity toward churches of another denomination or church polity. With that said, God has clearly vested church authority in a team of pastors (elders); Dangers exist in usurping authority from the place where God entrusted it – whether that be placing it in the hands of a congregational vote, deacons, a single pastor, or board of “elders” who aren’t really pastors.

But most important to me, I want to be faithful to establish the authority of our church plant in the most Biblical way possible. This church is Christ’s body; He’s the Lord; He’s the Chief Shepherd. I cede all my plans to His design.

Posted in Bible Doctrine

The Greatest Magic Trick of All Time… and the TRUTH

Posted on by James

The story of the Exodus is legendary – God rescuing & freeing His enslaved people; Moses, the insecure, fugitive outcast-turned-deliverer; the fantastic plagues; the Passover; the parting of the Red Sea; and one of the most intriguing elements of the Exodus – the Egyptian magicians. They were able to imitate the sign of Moses and even the first two plagues, but the magicians’ greatest trick is still fooling everyone in the 21st century?

 

Identifying the Magicians

Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. – 2 Timothy 3:8

Paul’s second letter to Timothy yields the two names that the Old Testament does not. Confirmation of Jannes & Jambres’ identity as two princes of Pharaoh’s magicians can be found everywhere from the Book of Jasher to Kabbalah, from Targum Jonathan to Pliny’s Natural History, from Jewish tradition to The Apocryphon of Jannes and Jambres the Magicians.

We would commonly define “magic” as sleight of hand/ illusion, but the true meaning of the word is sorcery, the use of hidden forces; it’s synonymous with witchcraft. It’s important to recognize the demonic powers behind these two magicians to see through their magic trick.

 

Recognizing their Trick

Jannes & Jambres withstood Moses by counterfeiting God’s work. The counterfeit signs looked so similar in style and content that it caused caused people to discount God’s power and disregard God’s message (Exodus 7:11-13. Exodus 7:22-23). 

The magicians mimicked Moses’ sign and turned their rods into serpents… but Moses’ rod (technically, Aaron’s) ate the rods of the magicians, illustrating their inferiority to the power of God. Likewise, the magicians imitated the plague of water into blood and the plague of frogs, but they failed to copy the the plague of lice and subsequent plagues (theories for which are as stimulating as they are varied). The primary lesson is that the magicians’ imitations, though impressive & similar, lack the power of God.

 

Seeing the Relevance

One of the great keys to Bible study is to observe & analyze the use of LIKE and AS. Let’s look at the context of the naming of these two magicians.

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. –  2 Timothy 3:1-8

Observe that Paul prophesies that in the “last days” false teachers will have a “form of godliness” but will deny the power thereof – Just like Jannes & Jambres had a form of God’s work but were of a different power. The false teachers will deceive people “AS” Jannes & Jambres withstood Moses. In other words, false teachers will cause people to discount God’s power and disregard God’s message the same way as the magicians – through counterfeits.

Make no mistake, Satan consistently COUNTERS the work of God by COUNTERFEITING the work of God. Examples include: His kingdom (Colossians 1:13), Christ (1 John 2:18), apostles (2 Corinthians 11:13), ministers (2 Corinthians 11:14-15), prophets (Matthew 7:15), teachers (2 Peter 2:1), and signs & wonders of the apostles (2 Thessalonians 2:8-9).

Yet reread the text above. It speaks specifically of counterfeits that will happen in the “last days.” Counterfeits that will “resist the truth” (see John 17:17). Counterfeits that will lead people to perpetually LEARN but never know the TRUTH. Interestingly, when the magicians see what they cannot produce, they declare that Moses’ work was the “finger of God” (Exodus 8:19).

Simply put – in the last days, Satan will work through men to counterfeit God’s Word. As the magician’s work, the counterfeits will be similar in style and content, yet they will lack God’s power, and they will produce a false sense of knowledge, and as a result people will be “led away with divers lusts.”

 

Recognizing the Counterfeits?

One helpful clue is the location. Even more clear would be the origin of the magicians – Egypt. A cursory study reveals that all Bibles originate from one of two lines of manuscript – ALEXANDRIA (Egypt) and ANTIOCH (Syria). We find the first mention of both of those cities in the same chapter of the Bible; Antioch is the origin of a man of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost whose service caused the Word of God to increase, disciples to multiply and people to be saved(Acts 6:3-8); Alexandria is the origin of heretics who tried to “resist” that work by “disputing”, accusing, and finally killing one of the aforementioned men of God. 

Interestingly, God does not tell how many magicians or how many counterfeits there were, but He attributes them to two men – Jannes and Jambres. Pliny suggests that they were familiar with the God of the Hebrews through the wisest sage of Egyptian history – the dream revealer, Joseph. Therefore it is plausible that the many counterfeits of God’s Truth can be attributed to two heretic men. If interested, one should read about Westcott and Hort.

A careful reading of Exodus 7-8 shows that the magicians (plural) counterfeited the signs & plagues of Moses. It is especially clear in Exodus 7:11-12, where Aaron’s rod (with Moses) ate the magicians rods (plural).  Finding a single counterfeit among a group of authentics may prove difficult, but you are tasked with finding a single authentic among a group of counterfeits. It might help to know that all Bibles in print, with the exception of one, are derived from the Alexandrian text; the lone exception translated from the Antioch Text is the King James Version.

 

My challenge to you

Most people answer questions about the Bible based on personal history, version readability, or humanistic philosophy. Instead, I challenge you to discover what the Bible says about itself; allow God, Himself, to answer questions like, “Did God perfectly preserve His words,” or “Does it matter which Bible I use?”

 

Your Thoughts

2 Timothy 3:15-17 is the completion of the chapter that warns of the immitations of Jannes and Jambres. What does it reveal about origin & preservation of Scripture?

Which passages of Scripture answer your questions about Biblical preservation?

What has shaped your beliefs and practices on Bible versions?

Posted in Bible Doctrine

The Virgin Birth – Does it really matter?

Posted on by James

A controversy is brewing this Christmas, and this time it’s not about me forgetting to buy someone a Christmas gift. This controversy concerns Andy Stanley’s teaching on the virgin birth; the mega-pastor’s popularity often makes him a target – sometimes for good reason, sometimes not. Does it matter whether the virgin birth is factually accurate? Does it matter if a person believes in the virgin birth?

Is the Virgin Birth critical to Christianity? – YES!

Christianity does not hinge on the truth or even the stories about the birth of Jesus, it really hinges on the resurrection of Jesus. – Andy Stanley

Andy Stanley defends his approach by asserting that the bodily Resurrection of Christ is the prime doctrine of Christianity and the virgin birth is extraneous. The Resurrection is indeed fundamental, but contrary to Stanley’s opinion, the virgin birth is also critical to Christianity.

Christmas is the celebration of the truth that distinguishes true Christianity from every other religion in the world. Every religion demands that man works up to achieve a higher plain or heaven; Christianity declares that God came down to man to give eternal life. It’s completely unique – that the Creator would be made like His creation; that the Almighty would be made a weak baby; that the Lord of all would be made a servant.

Without the virgin birth, Jesus was not begotten of God, not the Son of God, and not divine. Therefore without the virgin birth, Christianity is false. Furthermore, because Jesus was born of the seed of the woman (Genesis 3:15. Galatians 4:4), he did not inherit the sin nature of Adam (Romans 5:12-14). The virgin birth is THE reason why Jesus could be our spotless sacrificial Lamb.

To be fair, Stanley professes to believe the virgin birth, but his pick-and-choose theology is a growing trend in Western Churchianity. While it is wise to acknowledge cultural views & doubts, it would be foolish to discard Biblical doctrine because it lacks popularity. Much of Christianity strives to stay relevant in our Post-Christian culture by permitting men to embrace truths they find attractive and dispose of truths that require faith or submission. It is analogous to a wife striving to keep her marriage by permitting her husband to have affairs. Make no mistake; Jesus is not desperate. He preferred a few fully devoted followers over multitudes who just wanted to see miracles. He prefers a few of genuine faith than multitudes that selectively believe.

 

Is the Virgin Birth critical for salvation? NO… and YES!

One blogger compares Andy’s approach to Paul’s secular apologetic method at Mars Hill (Acts 17:16-34). There is undoubtedly Scriptural merit in using secular views to reach secular people (1 Corinthians 9:20-24), but there’s a tremendous difference between Paul using secular views that validate NT truths and Stanley validating secular views that disparage NT truths.

Can a person come to saving faith in Christ without believing the virgin birth? That’s a tough question. One can certainly be saved while IGNORANT of the virgin birth, but can he be saved while REJECTING the virgin birth? A better question would be, “Does the person believe that Jesus was God in flesh?” The answer will clearly define who has genuine faith in Christ (1 John 4:2-3). Jesus made validating His deity the focus of His ministry and accepting His deity as the subject of faith. It is first part of the great mystery of godliness (1 Timothy 3:16). And Paul’s quintessential verse on salvation requires BOTH belief in Christ’s deity & His resurrection (Romans 10:9). 

 

Your Thoughts:

  • Has the virgin birth been a difficult doctrine for you?
  • Where is the balance of teaching the Word of God and not putting the cart before the horse?
  • What dangers have you seen in dismissing or presenting too much doctrine?
Posted in Abortion

Abortion VS Life: What are the facts?

Posted on by James

My previous post compared 19th century slavery with modern abortion. Both atrocities were justified by de-humanizing the victims and defining them as property. As the previous post clearly demonstrates the Pro-Life position is MORALLY superior, this post intends to demonstrate the Pro-Life position is also FACTUALLY superior.

 

“The fetus is not alive.”

Abortion advocates famously label the fetus as “just a clump of cells,” but this claim does not hold up to scientific scrutiny. A fetus performs living, human functions – like heartbeats or measurable brain waves (every legal abortion stops both). Modern medical science now knows that a fetus can feel pain, be startled, respond to his mother’s laughter, dream & even begin learning his mother’s language.

Although recently discovered by science, these facts were well known in the ancient world. When God gave Moses the laws for the nation of Israel, He calls the fetus “life” (Exodus 21:22-23). The fetus is not an amorphous clump of cells but a complex, functioning, living being.

 

“The fetus is not a human being.”

In a feeble attempt to save face, abortion advocates fall back to the untenable position that the fetus is not a human being. Yet the Pro-Choice advocate never establishes of what species he believes the fetus belongs? Is there a zebra or aardvark in the woman’s uterus? This position, of course, also crumbles under factual scrutiny. A simply DNA test reveals that the fetus is absolutely human. And there’s more; science reveals that preborn babies feel human emotions – like fear, pain, connection, and love. 

Once again, we find Holy Scripture revealing facts long before science can explain them. According to Job 3:11, an unborn baby has a living soul (ghost), and even before the prophet Jeremiah’s organs were formed, God knew him as a living person with a unique plan (Jeremiah 1:5).  And consider this… the first person to recognize Jesus as Messiah, was an unborn baby (Luke 1:41-43).

 

“The fetus is part of the mother’s body.”

THE TRICK QUESTION: Shouldn’t a woman have the right to choose what she does with her body? This sneaky question is the premise of the Pro-Choice (Pro-Abortion) position, but A FETUS IS NOT THE WOMAN’S BODY. Having received 23 chromosomes from each parent, a fetus has its own distinct DNA. A fetus also has its own distinct blood. And no woman has 2 hearts, 2 brains, 4 arms, 4 eyes, and 4 legs.

THE REAL QUESTION: If our society deems it immoral & unlawful to murder babies after they’re born, why should we allow babies to be murdered before they’re born? It is a society’s responsibility to restrict behavior – even in regards to one’s own body; that’s why there are laws restricting self-mutilation, suicide and heroine abuse. But science confirms the plea of our conscience, that a fetus is a distinct living, human person. 

Posted in Family

Is paddling children effective?

Posted on by James

Is paddling even effective? The pervasive answer is a resounding NO. Ask a psychologist, a social worker, or a school administrator; read a textbook or a parenting book. The public scorn, the condescending knowledge of the professionals, the findings of “research,” and even the fear of legal repercussions leave most authorities silent on the matter… sadly, even pastors. I write this post in defense of this most critical practice of parenting. This is not meant to be exhaustive; there will be multiple more posts on this subject, but here I submit 4 challenges to the professionals.

1) The Historical Conflict

One author & outspoken adversary of corporal discipline, notes:

“There seems to be not a single exception. From Sumer to Egypt to China, from ancient India to pre-Columbian America, from Athens to Rome, children were hit.”

By exposing the widespread use of corporal discipline, the author’s intent is to explain the difficulty of eradicating its practice, but consider the facts of his statement. Without exception, every great civilization practiced corporal discipline. Here are a few:

  • The Sumerians were a highly intelligent, urban civilization who pioneered the earliest writing form, controlled the flooding of the Tigris & Euphrates rivers, and developed a base-60 numerical system which is still employed today in our time (60 seconds and 60 minutes) and geometry (360 degrees).
  • The Egyptians made scientific, agricultural and mathematical achievements. We are still amazed by the mathematical precision and puzzled on how Egypt’s Pyramids intersect with the planets and stars.
  • The Babylonians excelled in astronomy – predicting planetary movements, tracking Haley’s Comet, and creating the world’s earliest star catalog. The “Hammurabi Code” is still regarded as the first major, defined legal system of the world.
  • The Greeks remain renowned for their philosophy.
  • The Romans were industrious, innovative & powerful.

All cultures, including these great civilizations, practiced corporal discipline. Paddlers and spankers were not uncouth, cave-dwelling cannibals; they were philosophers, engineers, humanitarians, philanthropists, scientists, mathematicians and lawyers. So when someone poorly portray paddlers, remember – every great civilization in the history of the world valued corporal discipline as the preeminent way to instill character and raise children.

Now consider the audacity of the author’s conclusion – that it is ineffective to paddle children. After revealing that all humankind accepted corporal discipline, the author now asserts that all civilizations – including the mathematical Sumerians, the scientific Egyptians, the astronomical Babylonians, the philosophical Greeks, and logical Romans – were all horribly, foolishly wrong. If only all civilizations of all times knew what he knew about raising children.  The claim is especially absurd when you observe…

2) The Contemporary Contradiction

For decades, psychologists, governments, schools, & social workers have been demonizing corporal discipline and recommending alternate “learning” techniques; accordingly, we have seen the percentages of paddling homes decrease. If these opponents of corporal discipline are correct, we should be seeing a dramatic drop in hate crimes, domestic violence, school shootings, riots, murders, rape, greed, bullying, crime rates; defense attorneys should be going out of business; prisons should be near empty. Is that what you see? 

Over the past 30 years, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the federal prison population has jumped from 25,000 to 219,000 inmates, an increase of nearly 790%. (compare to 36% U.S. population growth).

According to the World Prison Brief – U.S. local jails are occupied at 86.4%; state prisons 115%; federal prisons 136%.

An even more clear indicator is Sweden, who passed a no-spanking law in 1979. The Akron Law Review provided its findings from 2010 research (in 30 years, the first generation of no-spanking is now raising the second generation).

Child abuse rates increased 500%.

From 1979-1994 Swedish children under 7 endured an almost 6-fold increase in physical abuse.

Teen violence skyrocketed in 90s (first group of teenagers since the law was passed). Youth criminal assault had increased by 6 times the 1984 rates.

3) The Authority Concept

“You can’t teach a child not to hit… by hitting them,” or “You can’t correct violence with violence.” At first paddling seems counterproductive, even hypocritical, but there’s an element that’s not being considered – authority. Authorities are granted punitive powers over their subordinates. It’s why governments wield power to search, sieze, detain, imprison, and even execute citizens who commit the exact same actions on their fellow-citizens. 

When a government exercises its punitive power to imprison a rapist, society does not mourn the innate hypocrisy, it celebrates justice. It is naturally perceived as a moral good. So it is with parental discipline; as the authority, parents wield corrective and punitive rights. Children do not see hypocrisy in healthy, family paddling; they see justice. They don’t learn violence; they learn obedience. 

If this principle of authority is dismissed, psychologists should fear that “Timeout” will cause a child to grow up and falsely imprison people in his basement; that “Taking away privileges and toys” will precipitate theft from children who don’t do as they want; that “Assigning chores” will justify forced labor or slavery on others. The accusation is illogical.

4) The Divine Construct

The previous three sections speak historically and logically to the arguments of “secular” (more accurately, New Age Religion) psychology. We simply cannot trust the new fads or false logic of modern parenting. If anyone knows how humans operate, it’s their Creator. If anyone knows how families should operate, it’s their Designer. What does God say in His Word?

Proverbs 22:15 Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.
One thing breaks the chains of disobedience – the paddle, and it does the job so well it drives disobedience from the child.

Proverbs 23:13-14 Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.
Paddling your child will not kill him, but withholding paddling will cripple their future and damn their soul, since they will lack an accurate view of a Just & Holy God.

Proverbs 13:24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
Paddling is an expression of love. Like AFFECTION, CORRECTION is a primary expression of love. A parent that cares more about the moral development, spiritual health, and eternal salvation of his child is motivated by love to paddle his child. The parent who cares more about harmony with and acceptance of the child is motivated by hate to withhold paddling. 

Hebrews 12:6-7 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
The intermediate goal of paddling is to teach the child to obey his human authorities – parents then teachers, governments. The ultimate goal of paddling is to train the child to submit to the Divine Authority. As holy & just, God must punish sin; parents teach their children about the Heavenly Father by paddling. That’s why corporal punishment is important to God and so necessary for our children.

 

What questions do you have about corporal discipline? 
What is your experience?
What strikes you about the above verses?

 

Posted in Bible Doctrine

The New Testament Canon

Posted on by James

Who decided which writings would be part of the New Testament Canon? What criteria was used in that determination? When was the list of New Testament books compiled? The truth might surprise you, as many of the classical answers conflict with history and with Scripture itself. A singular post cannot adequately address those questions, and honestly… neither can the totality of my understanding on the subject. 

Our church’s expository study of 1 Timothy shed light on the answers. In 1 Timothy 5:18, Paul quotes two texts of Scripture, the latter of which is most pertinent to this subject:

“For the scripture saith… The labourer is worthy of his reward.”

The quote is from Luke 10:7, which was likely penned just 2 years before Paul wrote 1 Timothy. By defining Luke’s gospel as “scripture,” Paul demonstrates a remarkable truth – the apostles and the early church discerned (by Divine power) which writings were given by inspiration. This truth is verified by Peter recognizing Paul’s epistles as “scripture” (2 Peter 3:15-16) and is illustrated by the churches being ordered to pass epistles to other churches (Colossians 4:16. 1 Thessalonians 5:27).

The truth is substantiated by documents like the Muratorian Fragment (a list of the writings observed by an early church, including all the New Testament besides Hebrews, James, 1, Peter, 2 Peter, and 3 John and dated just 75 years from the writing of Revelation) and the Peshitta (Syriac Bible produced less than 100 years from the writing of Revelation includes all but 2 Peter, 2 John 3 John, Jude, Revelation).

In short, it is undeniably clear that God gave His Word by inspiration and that He preserved His Word clearly. The more one studies the New Testament Canon, the more conspicuous God’s hand is in the velocity and precision of the acceptance of the Scriptures. You have every reason to trust that ALL Scripture is given by inspiration of God and that EVERY word of God is pure. Read it. Study it. Meditate on it. Love it. Obey it. Rejoice in it. Teach it.